2025
2025
UX Improvements for York St John University
I worked on improving the Policies and Documents section of York St John University’s website. The aim was to make it easier for users including students, staff, and the public to find, understand, and access key university policies.
My approach combined UX research, content auditing, and information architecture design to create a single, intuitive catalogue with improved labelling, navigation, and search functionality.
UX Researcher
Content Designer
UX/UI Designer
Information Architecture
Usability Testing
Prototyping
Figma
FigJam
10 days
Users struggle to quickly find university policies due to a cluttered and confusing structure that lacks clear organisation, consistent labelling, and intuitive navigation which can lead to frustration and wasted time.
First, I recorded over 200 individual policy documents and noted inconsistencies in naming, formatting, and categorisation.
I assessed how other UK universities structure their policy pages, identifying best practices in grouping, navigation, and layout.
Given that the first impression was a lack of organisation, I decided to map the entire information architecture of the site. I recorded over 200 individual documents and noted inconsistencies in naming, formatting, and categorisation.
Snippets of the Information Architecture
Task Scenario Testing
I set up a remote task scenario test, where users shared their screen and I observed them. Participants were asked to find a specific policy using the existing website.
Users struggled with too many clicks and unclear labels, revealing the need for clearer organisation and visual hierarchy.
You are a member of the public who wants to make a Subject Access Request to the University.
Before submitting, you want to understand the policy and process. Go to the Policies and Documents section of the website and find the relevant policy.
You have 10 minutes to complete the task.
Average interactions: 12.8
Average errors: 4.5
Longest time: 5 minutes 28 seconds
User Feedback
“I noticed that between rows of cards there was a large gap between them, which made me think there was a relationship between the rows.”
User 1 · Leeds
“There were too many categories on the page to really notice what they even were, so I spent more time reading each category than I wanted to.”
User 2 · Sandhurst
Before designing a solution, I wanted to understand who was using the Policies and Documents section and why. It was clear from the initial research that the site served a wide range of audiences, from curious sixth formers to senior academics and members of the public, but their goals and pain points are different.
After mapping out the existing site and identifying over 200 individual documents, I realised the problem wasn’t just visual — it was structural. Policies were scattered across formats, labelled inconsistently, and buried behind multiple clicks. The design challenge became clear: to bring order, consistency, and context to a chaotic system.
Logical groups and umbrella categories
One of the main issues with the original page was the excessive number of categories (27 in total) which made scanning and navigation unnecessarily complex.
To streamline this, I introduced a system of umbrella categories that grouped related themes together.
For example, Health and safety, Major Incidents, and Safeguarding were originally separate sections, each containing only a few documents. These have now been combined under a single, clearer heading: “Safety, wellbeing and security.”
Shaping the Information Architecture
I then worked to reorganise existing content into logical, human-centred categories such as Core policies, For students, Conducting research, and For staff/faculty.
Each of these areas then had the relevant umbrella categories below them.
This simple reframing allowed users to skip to what area was most relevant to them, instead of scanning long, generic lists.
Policy cards
Once the structure made sense, I translated it into a visual system. Each document became a 'policy card' with a clear title, format, and file size, accompanied by an icon that indicated its function, whether it could be downloaded or viewed online.
Policies and documents catalogue
As the redesign took shape, I wanted to create a single place where every policy could be found without confusion or guesswork. The original site scattered documents across multiple sections, forcing users to click through page after page in search of the right file.
To solve this, I designed a central catalogue: a clean, alphabetical list of all policies and documents in one location. Users no longer had to know where something “lived” on the site; they could simply scroll to it directly.
To make the experience even more efficient, I added filter options that allowed users to sort by category, document format, or user group. Whether a student looking for housing guidance or a staff member checking a compliance policy, users could now reach the right document in seconds.
“I didn’t realise I should have clicked the first button to access an easier list, it wasn’t obvious.”
“I usually use search because I don’t want to scroll through everything to find what I need.”
“The list feels too long to scroll through, it would be better if the results were split up.”
Old UI
New UI
The final design transformed what had once been a dense, confusing collection of links into a single, unified catalogue. Where the old page asked users to hunt for information, the new one invited them to explore.
This project taught me the importance of clear information architecture and consistent language in improving user experience for content-heavy sites.
I refined my skills in UX research, content structuring, and Figma prototyping, and deepened my understanding of accessibility and findability in web design.
Next time, I’d conduct tree testing earlier to validate navigation structures before high-fidelity prototyping.